Making mobility work for adaptation to environmental changes :

Subtitle
Results from the MECLEP global research
Volume, number, page
144 p.
Year of Publication
2017
Author(s)
BLOCHER Julia
GEMENNE François
BRUYCKERE Luka De
Editor(s)
MELDE Susanne
LACZKO Frank
GEMENNE François
Organization Name
International Organization for Migration
Acronym
IOM
Publisher
IOM
City
Geneva
Country of Publication
Switzerland
Full Date
2017
Considered Countries
Dominican Republic
Haití
Kenya
Republic of Mauritius
Papua New Guinea
Vietnamam
Category
Official Documents
Theme
Technology
Country - European Union
Agreements
Summits
BIREGIONAL DIALOGUES UE-LAC
Government
Civil Society
Keyword(s)
Migration and Development
Climate Change
Climate change policy
Climate change mitigation
International migration
Migration policy
Environment
Population policy
Causes of environmental damage
Environmental impact
Demography
EU aid
Financial aid
Development aid
Paris Climate Agreement
COP 21
Human settlements
Human geography
Comparative analysis
Refugees
Abstract
This report is the final publication of the European Union–funded Migration, Environment and Climate Change: Evidence for Policy (MECLEP) project. The comparative report builds on desk reviews, household surveys and qualitative interviews conducted in the six project countries (Dominican Republic, Haiti, Kenya, Republic of Mauritius, Papua New Guinea and Viet Nam) to assess the extent to which migration, including displacement and planned relocation, can benefit or undermine adaptation to environmental and climate change. Despite the different social and environmental contexts of the six studied countries, migration serves as an adaptation strategy as it often helps migrant households to diversify income and increase their preparedness for future hazards. Conversely, displacement due to natural hazards tends to pose challenges to adaptation as it increases the vulnerability of those displaced. Finally, planned relocation can both represent a successful adaptation strategy and expose the affected population to new vulnerabilities.

In this regard, the report highlights the importance of sharing examples of good practices for locally driven and rights-based planned relocations. Other important policy implications include the need for the following:

(a) Investing in disaster risk reduction and resilience to address environmental displacement;
(b) Integrating migration into urban planning to reduce challenges for migrants and communities of destination; and
(c) Stressing the importance of paying particular attention to gender issues and the needs of vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and trapped population.

In general, the report demonstrates how data and evidence are fundamental in formulating comprehensive policy responses and facilitating the potential positive effects of environmental migration.
Download document